If you’ve ever wandered through the shadowy corners of religious history, you’ve likely encountered the name John Fox — the Elizabethan writer whose monumental work, Actes and Monuments, became better known as Fox’s Book of Martyrs. By the time the 1814 edition appeared, the book had already shaped English Protestant identity for over two centuries. It was a household text, a pulpit companion, and, depending on who you ask, either a sacred chronicle of heroic suffering… or a dangerous piece of propaganda.
Let’s explore what the book actually contains — and why later generations sometimes branded it “evil.”
What the Book of Martyrs Is About
Fox’s work is a sprawling martyrology — a history of Christian persecution from the earliest days of the Church through the Reformation. It begins with the deaths of the apostles under Roman rule and stretches all the way to the burnings of Protestants under Queen Mary I.
Key themes and content include:
Early Christian persecution under Rome, including dramatic accounts of apostolic deaths.
Medieval dissenters such as Wycliffe, Huss, and the Lollards, framed as proto‑Protestants resisting corruption.
Reformation martyrs, especially English Protestants executed during Mary’s reign — the emotional core of the book.
Polemic against Roman Catholic authority, portraying Protestantism as the true continuation of early Christianity.
By the 1814 edition, the text had been repeatedly reprinted, expanded, and — crucially — altered. Victorian editors often rewrote or sanitized sections, creating versions that differed significantly from Fox’s originals. Scholars note that these later editions introduced distortions, omissions, and editorial bias.
Why Some Consider the Book “Evil”
The word evil is strong — but it reflects a long tradition of criticism. Several historical and scholarly concerns contribute to this reputation:
It was used as anti‑Catholic propaganda
Fox’s book was never neutral. It was written during the Elizabethan settlement, when Protestant identity was fragile and Catholicism was politically suspect. The book’s vivid descriptions of Catholic cruelty — burnings, tortures, betrayals — were intended to warn England never to return to Rome.
For centuries, the book was placed in churches alongside the Bible, shaping public opinion. Critics argued that it fuelled hatred, fear, and division.
Accusations of dishonesty and exaggeration
Even in Fox’s own time, opponents accused him of lying on an unprecedented scale. Later scholars, including S. R. Maitland, attacked the book as dishonest and inaccurate, pointing out:
chronological errors
biased interpretations
selective quoting
myth‑making presented as fact
Although some modern scholars defend Fox as generally reliable with documents, the book undeniably blends fact with dramatic storytelling.
Later editions introduced further corruption
The 19th‑century editions — including those around 1814 — often rewrote Fox’s text, smoothing over inconsistencies or amplifying polemical elements. These editorial interventions created versions that were even more ideologically charged.
To critics, this made the book not just biased, but manipulative.
Graphic violence used for moral shock value
Fox’s descriptions of martyrdom are intentionally visceral: bodies torn, burned, crushed, mutilated. These scenes were meant to inspire Protestant devotion and horror at Catholic authority.
Some later readers saw this as spiritual fear‑mongering, using suffering as emotional leverage.
It shaped centuries of sectarian hostility
The book’s influence was enormous — “counted in English history as much as Drake’s drum,” as historian E. Gordon Rupp put it. Its stories became part of English cultural memory, reinforcing suspicion of Catholics well into the 19th and 20th centuries.
To critics, this long legacy of division is the book’s most “evil” consequence.
So Is It Truly Evil?
The answer depends on perspective.
-
To Protestants of the 16th–19th centuries, Fox’s work was a sacred testament of courage and divine truth.
-
To Catholics, it was a slanderous attack filled with exaggerations and hostility.
-
To modern historians, it is a complex blend of documentation, mythmaking, propaganda, and cultural memory.
The 1814 edition sits at a fascinating crossroads: old enough to preserve Foxe’s original fire, yet shaped by Victorian editorial hands that intensified its polemical edge.
Fox’s Book of Martyrs is one of those texts that refuses to sit quietly on the shelf. It is dramatic, biased, powerful, and deeply woven into the fabric of English religious identity. Whether you see it as a beacon of faith or a dangerous instrument of division, its impact is undeniable.